Massachusetts State Income Tax
Tax Information Sheet Launch Massachusetts
Income Tax Calculator
Note: Massachusetts' income tax has a single flat tax rate for all income.
Massachusetts collects a state income tax at a maximum marginal tax rate of %, spread across tax brackets. Unlike the Federal Income Tax, Massachusetts' state income tax does not provide couples filing jointly with expanded income tax brackets.
Massachusetts' maximum marginal income tax rate is the 1st highest in the United States, ranking directly below Massachusetts' %. You can learn more about how the Massachusetts income tax compares to other states' income taxes by visiting our map of income taxes by state.
Massachusetts has a flat tax of 5.13% on most types of income. Seven states have a flat income tax, and of those seven Massachusetts has the highest state income tax rate. While the tax rate is set explicitly by the Massachusetts legislature, the Massachusetts personal exemption is indexed to inflation and changes every year.
There are -866 days left until Tax Day, on April 15th 2015. The IRS will start accepting eFiled tax returns in January 2015 - you can start your online tax return today for free with TurboTax .
Income tax deductions are expenses that can be deducted from your gross pre-tax income. Using deductions is an excellent way to reduce your Massachusetts income tax and maximize your refund, so be sure to research deductions that you mey be able to claim on your Federal and Massachusetts tax returns. For details on specific deductions available in Massachusetts, see the list of Massachusetts income tax deductions.
Tax-Rates.org provides easy access to five of the most commonly used Massachusetts income tax forms, in downloadable PDF format. For all of the tax forms we provide, visit our Massachusetts tax forms library or the 's tax forms page.
Massachusetts Department of Revenue PO Box 7000, Boston, MA 02204
Massachusetts Department of Revenue PO Box 7003, Boston, MA 02204
You can save time and money by electronically filing your Massachusetts income tax directly with the . Benefits of e-Filing your Massachusetts tax return include instant submission, error checking, and faster refund response times. Most tax preparers can electronically file your return for you, or you can do it yourself using free or paid income tax software, like the examples listed below.
To e-file your Massachusetts and Federal income tax returns, you need a piece of tax software that is certified for eFile by the IRS. While most in-depth tax software charges a fee, there are several free options available through the states, and simple versions are also offered free of charge by most tax software companies.
The two most popular tax software packages are H&R Block At Home, sold by the H&R Block tax preparation company, and TurboTax Federal & State, sold by the Intuit software company. Both companies produce multiple editions for simple to very complex tax returns, so be sure to carefully compare the features offered by each package.
If your state tax witholdings are greater then the amount of income tax you owe the state of Massachusetts, you will receive an income tax refund check from the government to make up the difference.
It should take one to three weeks for your refund check to be processed after your income tax return is recieved. E-filing your return and filing early can help ensure your refund check gets sent as quickly as possible.
Once you've filed your tax return, all you have to do is wait for your refund to arrive. If you want to check the status of your Massachusetts tax refund, you can visit the Massachusetts Income Tax Refund page.
What If Taxpayers Could Choose If Taxes Went To The State Or Federal Level?
In recent years, we've examined any number of ways of decentralizing the American political system. These step-by-step moves can include decentralizing the monetary system, decentralizing the military, decentralizing immigration policy, and decentralizing elections.
Most recently, we looked at decentralizing the welfare state, and found that each US state is more than wealthy enough and big enough to run its own welfare state at the state level without any need of planning or centralization through Washington, DC. Whether or not one thinks a welfare state is a good or necessary thing, the fact remains the US government is not an essential part of the equation.
One piece of information that stood out the state-level analysis of tax revenue: the amount of taxes collected by the federal government far outpaces that collected at the state level. Nationwide, state-level tax bills are 28 percent the size of the federal tax bill. In a midsize state like Georgia, for example, residents pay 21 billion in taxes to the state government. However, those same residents pay a total of 86 billion to the federal government. The federal tax bill for Georgians is more than four times the size of the state tax bill.
Let's look at it another way:
Of all the state-level and federal-level tax money squeezed from Georgia residents, only 19 percent of it goes to the state government.
In the second graph, we can see how much of the tax revenue produced by each state's residents (in dollars) go to either state or federal levels.
Hawaii, for instance, tops the list with 45 percent of all its tax revenue going to the state. At the other end of the list is Delaware where only 13 percent of the total tax revenue is going to the state of Delaware. (This excludes local taxes.) At the national level, 22 percent of all revenues collected — by either a state government or the federal government — go to the states.
This could be due to several things. In states where a high percentage of tax revenue goes to states, this may be due to low incomes, since federal revenues are heavily dependent on wages and income. A low income state may nevertheless collect state level sales taxes, property taxes, and other taxes. This may then drive a relatively high amount of tax revenue to the state. This may very well be the case in West Virginia, New Mexico, and Mississippi where incomes are relatively low.
In some cases, though, the states at the top of the list may simply be high-tax states that collect a lot of revenue. Indeed, Hawaii, Vermont, and Maine are all relatively high-tax states according to the Tax Foundation.
In every state, rich or poor, high-tax or low-tax, the federal government is getting the lion's share of taxes wrung from the pockets of the taxpayers.
But, most of that ends up being spent in the states, anyway. So, an obvious question presents itself: why send all that money to Washington first? Why not just spend it where it originates?
More importantly, why not let the taxpayers themselves have more of a say over where that money goes in the first place?
It would be . instructive to allow the various [taxpayers] to check off what specific services or agencies they wish to earmark for expenditure of their funds. It would be still more fun to see vicious and truthful competitive advertising between bureaus: “No, no, don’t contribute to those lazy louts in the Department of Transportation (or whatever), give to us.” For once, government propaganda might even prove to be instructive and enjoyable.
But Rothbard's reform here is too timid. It assumes that the tax monies must first go to Washington, DC.
But what if the taxpayers could decide — holding the total size of the tax bill constant, for the sake of argument — what level of government they wanted their tax money to go to.
In the spirit of Rothbard's reform, let's allow the taxpayers to check a box deciding whether or not their tax dollars will go to DC or if they'll simply be sent directly to state or local government.
Then we'll see just how much the taxpayers think they need federal bureaucrats do divvy up their money and eventually send some of it back to the taxpayer's home state.
It's a safe bet that the amount of federal revenue would decline under such a reform. Yet, not all taxpayers would want their tax revenues directed to the state and local levels only. After all, there is a very large number of Americans that live off federal tax revenue, whether they're Social Security recipients, military personnel, or highly paid engineers who fancy themselves as "private sector" workers, but who are really living off tax revenues as defense-contractor employees.
Looking at a map of federal spending on a state-by-state basis, we might guess which states might see a relatively small amount of tax revenue directed to the state level by taxpayers in our little experiment.
But even within these states, we'd see interesting conflicts among taxpayers. Younger workers, for example, might want their tax money to go to the state and local levels where their young children would benefit from state and local spending on schools. This would be in direct conflict with Social-Security recipients, of course, who live off the sweat of the brow of current wage earners, and who are more interested in getting a government check than in funding schools.
In that case — as Rothbard might suggest — it would be fun to see the AARP run ads denouncing young workers for directing their funds away from federal programs and ignoring old pensioners.
We might see similar conflicts between private sector and public sector workers. Small business owners might be more likely to appreciate state-funded and locally-funded amenities such as roads and local law enforcement. Your local plumber might be less enthusiastic about shipping his money off the Washington to fund the invasion of yet another country he's never heard of.
On the other hand, a reform like this would allow states like California to achieve the more "enlightened9quot; welfare state the state has always wanted. After all, this is a state that wants its own Canada-style single-payer health care system. Where the tax revenues produced by Californians kept the state, Californians could have their long-desired social-democratic paradise. The plus side is the rest of us wouldn't have to pay for it.
what comes first state or federal tax return
Name: Expompima Email: 52atwep6dotcom Product: eBay Companion Summary: GammonEmpire.com - Top Online BackGammon Software - Play Backgammon Online Comments: <a href=http://www.soundsbox.com>9lt;img9gt;http://www.legalsounds.com/legalsounds/upload/LeftColumnBanner/English.lproj/27.gif9lt;/img9gt;9lt;/a9gt; <a href=http://tunespro.com>9lt;img9gt;http://www.legalsounds.com/legalsounds/upload/LeftColumnBanner/English.lproj/2.png9lt;/img9gt;9lt;/a9gt; <a href=http://www.soundsbox.com>9lt;b9gt;Buy Mp3s</b9gt;9lt;/a9gt; offers the largest selection of music online.
In the past few days in England we have seen newspapers publishing photos of queues outside Northern Rock bank branches, waiting to withdraw their savings following concerns about the bank's viability. Much less press coverage has been afforded to online Northern Rock customers who were trying to transfer funds from Northern Rock to other banks. Yesterday's Daily Telegraph newspaper mentioned a rumour that the bank had acted to prevent/restrict online transactions. It also suggested that Northern Rock would not discuss the problem, whether accidentally or deliberately caused.
Hey folks, Just me again. So now I have a new problem =P Background: My hosting company has been down 6 hours over the past 2 weeks. Which equates to about 97.61% uptime if my calculations are correct. This is not acceptable, so I'm looking at SquareSpace for their virtualization, apparently not even TWIT or DIGG can take down a SquareSpace site, NICE. I also want to charge only $0.99 for my software. Paypal would cost me $0.32871 per transaction. But I can't use PayPal (I think). Plimus, which would work would charge me $0.75 per transaction. Ou.
Name: AspesTugevove Email: madotybejohn1985atgmaildotcom Product: eBay Companion Summary: buy software online Comments: <a href=http://www.usoemstore.com>oem software</a9gt; From URL: http://en-GB.www.mozilla.com/en-GB/add-ons/ebay/feedback/ Note to readers: Hendrix gives no expectation of a response to this feedback but if you wish to provide one you must BCC (not CC) the sender for them to see it. .
imagine there was an sp beyond your control (i.e. you cannot use output parameters to obtain the value) but you had to catch the return value submitted by "return <value9gt;9quot; how would you do that? execute returns boolean executeUpdate returns int, but obviously not the return value but rows affected or so what the. -- pat Hello Pat, For the return value you wills till need to register it as an output parameter, no matter how you execute the sproc. You would need to send the SQL as something like: <? = call sprocName(?, ?, . )> The for the retu.
my friend does not have a internet connection, he require vlc (to watch movies) and g++(as c++ compiler). please tell me that how he can install these softwares in his pc offline?? -- SalmanQamar ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Use VLC off packman -- openSUSE 11.3 | KDE 4.5.5 | 8GB RAM | 320GB+1TB+2TB HDD | Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 @ 2.66Ghz | NVIDIA GTX 260 *New users please read the New User How To/FAQ* ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ah7013's Profile: http://forums.opensuse.o.
PLEASE SEND ME THE CODE Hey Boy I don't think that anyone give u ready made of such software But if there is anyone want to do this please send this software with source code for me too. thanks [email protected] Could u plz Give Some Details like(Funtinality) I will try to do it in my spare time also send the email id where i will send it.
I am looking to purchase Online Education/Online Learning software, similar to an e-Commerce store that will handle the purchases as well as track credit hours,etc. Most of the course content is text/html but there would be some videos as well. Does anybody know of any software out there that is written in .NET that might meet this need? I don't know how effective online education could be. In my opinion its better to download tutorials and learn yourself. Belive me self study is the best study. You can download freeware tutorials from http://www.tutorial.2ya.com Rest is up to .
I'm a little confused about the relationship between these 3 utilities. Just to clarify: rug = rug Online Update = the item in Yast | Software Software Updater = double-clicking the Updates icon in the "taskbar9quot; I expected similar content from these sources but was disappointed. Rug seems yum-like in that it gives what appears to be updated versions of rpms. Online Update seems to act the same way, except ONLY for sles10 packages Software Updater goes its own way by describing "categories9quot; of updates presumably containing collections of rpms, like.
Name: Jannis Email: jdotrdot-atwebdotde Product: Other (please state) Summary: mozilla based online-banking-software Comments: Hello, I like your products very much and so I got the idea that an online- banking-software would be a very great product because there are very few or no good opensource-applications for this job. I'm sorry, not beeing able to code so I unfortunately only can write you my thought. With kind regards Jannis Browser Details: Opera/9.22 (Windows NT 5.1; U; de) .
Hi alli want to make the online chatting software for my site.By which anyone who want to make contact with mecan chat with me.arvindharitus Hello,doing this application would take time+effort from uI suggest to use commercial one just that found in cutesoft.netHTHregardsASP.NET Hosting (HostingFest).
Hey everybody. Our license for Live Meeting is up for renewal, and I'm very interested in suggestions you have for ALTERNATIVE online conferencing software. In particular, I'd love to (of course) find anything that's free or open source that would meet our needs. Some core requirements are (in no particular order): - support for assigning presenter rights to another attendee - a moderated Q&A/chat interface - resolution of 1280x1024 - Scalable to at least 500 users - VoIP - Clients available for more than just Windows PCs 😉 Feel free to also list commercial s.